https://embed-ssl.wistia.com/deliveries/a9c22c9fa7b8dc95e5620c87bbba3ec9.mp4
Innovation is just inherent in our culture. We are expected to innovate, and we have innovation budgets to use. The other challenge in doing innovative research is that stakeholders usually pay for the majority of the research, and I have to execute it. So with that, they hold their money in their budget very sacred – what that means is that it’s a lot easier to rinse and repeat. If you’re doing something more innovative, it is scarier, and you are taking a lot bigger risk. It is not just a risk of the stakeholder and me, but also of the business and all retail partnerships that we have – there is a lot at stake. So I really gauge how to approach innovation based on whether or not my stakeholder really wants to play and try new things or if they are a little more apprehensive. I will typically start with something more comfortable but then push the boundaries. So, for example, it’s a lot easier to say we’re making a quantitative approach with this study. We do those all the time, but if we do this quantitative study, we push this other little piece on top of it; it unlocks a whole different area. Are we willing to try that?
So I am just ticking away at those things and building on what’s comfortable, but always thinking a couple of steps ahead of what the stakeholder’s needs.
I think that’s where you get a nice secret sauce.